A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.
To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).
User contributions for Hixie
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
9 February 2011
- 20:2520:25, 9 February 2011 diff hist −768 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for addition of "Guidance for User Agents"
- 20:2520:25, 9 February 2011 diff hist +520 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for the img elements defualt role being img [sic]
- 20:2120:21, 9 February 2011 diff hist +1 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for the img elements deualt role being img [sic]
- 20:2020:20, 9 February 2011 diff hist −787 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for addition of "WAI-ARIA and HTML5 Attributes" table
- 20:1920:19, 9 February 2011 diff hist +1,154 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for changes to allowed roles on the a element
- 20:1320:13, 9 February 2011 diff hist +1,941 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for changes to allowed roles on the a element
- 19:5719:57, 9 February 2011 diff hist +489 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for defining h1 to h6 element that does have an hgroup ancestor
- 19:4219:42, 9 February 2011 diff hist −960 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for addition the merging of the tables in the current spec text [sic]
- 19:3519:35, 9 February 2011 diff hist −2,073 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Process objections
7 February 2011
- 17:5117:51, 7 February 2011 diff hist +546 Change Proposal for ISSUE-140 →Restrictions on Applicable Specifications
- 09:4009:40, 7 February 2011 diff hist +468 N Objections against CPs for ISSUE-140 Created page with '* There is no use case that actually gets satisfied by this suggestion. ** In particular, the obvious use case of "a way to get a common understanding with someone else so that y...'
- 01:4901:49, 7 February 2011 diff hist +845 Change Proposal for ISSUE-140 →Rationale
6 February 2011
- 21:5521:55, 6 February 2011 diff hist +2,152 Change Proposal for ISSUE-150 No edit summary
- 21:4221:42, 6 February 2011 diff hist +546 Change Proposal for ISSUE-150 →Rationale
27 January 2011
- 00:0900:09, 27 January 2011 diff hist +1,680 FAQ →Isn’t the whole point of a specification to establish fixed point of reference so that all parties implementing the standard can ensure they have a common baseline of compatibility?
- 00:0700:07, 27 January 2011 diff hist +137 FAQ →How will anything be deprecated and removed if there are no version numbers?
26 January 2011
- 20:3120:31, 26 January 2011 diff hist −1 Main Page No edit summary
25 January 2011
- 20:2220:22, 25 January 2011 diff hist 0 Specs No edit summary
21 January 2011
- 23:0523:05, 21 January 2011 diff hist +1,236 FAQ →How can web developers know which features are safe to use?
- 22:5122:51, 21 January 2011 diff hist +193 FAQ →What does "Living Standard" mean?
- 22:4922:49, 21 January 2011 diff hist +786 FAQ →How about support in browsers for previous versions of this “living” HTML standard?
- 22:4522:45, 21 January 2011 diff hist +37 FAQ →How are developers to determine when certain parts of their pages will become invalid?
- 22:4422:44, 21 January 2011 diff hist +5 FAQ →Will HTML become an unusable mess as features are removed and old valid documents suddenly become invalid, if there are no version numbers?
- 22:4322:43, 21 January 2011 diff hist +4 FAQ →Will HTML become a bloated unimplementable mess as old features pile up if there are no version numbers?
- 22:4322:43, 21 January 2011 diff hist −25 FAQ →How will anything be deprecated and removed if there are no version numbers?
- 22:4222:42, 21 January 2011 diff hist +168 FAQ →How will anything be deprecated and removed if there are no version numbers?
- 22:4222:42, 21 January 2011 diff hist +1,389 FAQ →How are developers to determine when certain parts of their pages will become invalid?
- 22:3222:32, 21 January 2011 diff hist +55 FAQ →How are developers to determine when certain parts of their pages will become invalid?
- 22:3222:32, 21 January 2011 diff hist +143 FAQ →How are developers to determine when certain parts of their pages will become invalid?
- 22:3122:31, 21 January 2011 diff hist +506 FAQ →How do we know what to use, without having some sort of snapshot that browsers can aim at and developers can evaluate?
- 22:2822:28, 21 January 2011 diff hist +1 FAQ →How do we know what to use, without having some sort of snapshot that browser can aim at and developers can evaluate?
- 22:2622:26, 21 January 2011 diff hist +715 FAQ No edit summary
- 22:2122:21, 21 January 2011 diff hist +558 FAQ →How can web developers know which features are safe to use?
- 21:2621:26, 21 January 2011 diff hist 0 FAQ →If you do not publish snapshots every now and again, you are Orwellian in your recognition of the role the mistakes of the past play into the present and the future.
- 21:2621:26, 21 January 2011 diff hist −2 FAQ →If you do not publish snapshots every now and again, you are Orwellian in your recognition of the role the mistakes of the past play into the present and the future.
- 21:2621:26, 21 January 2011 diff hist +1 FAQ →How can web developers know which features are safe to use?
- 21:2521:25, 21 January 2011 diff hist −2 FAQ →This means you will only able to add to a spec, not redefine it.
- 21:2521:25, 21 January 2011 diff hist +2 FAQ →This means you will only able to add to a spec, not redefine it.
- 21:2521:25, 21 January 2011 diff hist −2 FAQ →This means you will only able to add to a spec, not redefine it.
- 21:2521:25, 21 January 2011 diff hist +207 FAQ →How about support in browsers for previous versions of this “living” HTML standard?
- 21:2221:22, 21 January 2011 diff hist +812 FAQ →The WHATWG Process
- 21:1821:18, 21 January 2011 diff hist +416 FAQ No edit summary
- 21:1521:15, 21 January 2011 diff hist +114 FAQ →“Living specification” sounds like a draft that may and will change at any moment and is probably not even complete at any moment of time...
- 21:1221:12, 21 January 2011 diff hist +26 FAQ →“Living specification” sounds like a draft that may and will change at any moment and is probably not even complete at any moment of time...
- 21:1121:11, 21 January 2011 diff hist +621 FAQ No edit summary
- 20:4820:48, 21 January 2011 diff hist +1,076 FAQ →The WHATWG Process
20 January 2011
- 17:0917:09, 20 January 2011 diff hist +9 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 No edit summary
- 07:1307:13, 20 January 2011 diff hist +36 FAQ →What are the various versions of the spec?
- 07:1207:12, 20 January 2011 diff hist −295 FAQ →What are the various versions of the spec?
- 07:0407:04, 20 January 2011 diff hist −49 FAQ →What are the various versions of the spec?
- 06:5006:50, 20 January 2011 diff hist +2,473 FAQ No edit summary
- 05:0105:01, 20 January 2011 diff hist +366 FAQ No edit summary
- 04:4404:44, 20 January 2011 diff hist +864 FAQ No edit summary
- 04:2104:21, 20 January 2011 diff hist −402 FAQ No edit summary
19 January 2011
- 20:4920:49, 19 January 2011 diff hist +31 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Risk
- 20:3520:35, 19 January 2011 diff hist −58 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Negative Effects
- 18:4418:44, 19 January 2011 diff hist +200 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Negative Effects
- 18:3918:39, 19 January 2011 diff hist +166 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Other technologies
- 17:1517:15, 19 January 2011 diff hist +68 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Cognitive difficulty
- 08:1108:11, 19 January 2011 diff hist −149 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →References
- 08:1008:10, 19 January 2011 diff hist +323 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Impact
- 08:0508:05, 19 January 2011 diff hist +424 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Cognitive difficulty
- 08:0308:03, 19 January 2011 diff hist +708 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Other technologies
- 07:5607:56, 19 January 2011 diff hist −77 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Cognitive difficulty
- 07:4707:47, 19 January 2011 diff hist +209 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Cognitive difficulty
- 07:3207:32, 19 January 2011 diff hist +600 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Other technologies
- 07:1307:13, 19 January 2011 diff hist +1,522 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 No edit summary
- 06:5406:54, 19 January 2011 diff hist +263 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Intentional misimplementation
- 06:5106:51, 19 January 2011 diff hist +758 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Rationale
- 04:0704:07, 19 January 2011 diff hist +2 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 No edit summary
- 02:5102:51, 19 January 2011 diff hist +169 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 No edit summary
- 02:5002:50, 19 January 2011 diff hist +268 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Rationale
- 02:4802:48, 19 January 2011 diff hist +42 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Cognitive difficulty
- 02:4702:47, 19 January 2011 diff hist 0 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Cognitive difficulty
- 02:4702:47, 19 January 2011 diff hist +646 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Cognitive difficulty
- 02:3602:36, 19 January 2011 diff hist +3,485 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Rationale
- 02:2702:27, 19 January 2011 diff hist +1,286 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Rationale
18 January 2011
- 23:1723:17, 18 January 2011 diff hist +1,445 Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 →Details
- 22:4322:43, 18 January 2011 diff hist +264 N Change Proposal for ISSUE-120 Created page with '== Summary == Simplify the specification by removing features that are documented to be confusing to users. __TOC__ == Rationale == == Details == == Impact == === Positive ...'
17 January 2011
- 21:1621:16, 17 January 2011 diff hist +7 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Title and introduction
- 21:1521:15, 17 January 2011 diff hist +259 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the proposed text
- 21:1321:13, 17 January 2011 diff hist +18 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Process objections
- 09:5609:56, 17 January 2011 diff hist 0 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Rationale
- 09:5509:55, 17 January 2011 diff hist 0 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10903: Requesting more introductory text
- 09:5509:55, 17 January 2011 diff hist −91 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the other change proposal
- 09:3509:35, 17 January 2011 diff hist +30 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10903: Requesting more introductory text
- 09:3509:35, 17 January 2011 diff hist +67 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10594: Move some requirements regarding ARIA attributes into a separate table
- 09:3209:32, 17 January 2011 diff hist +68 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10592: Request regarding the ARIA role of heading elements inside HGROUP elements
- 00:5100:51, 17 January 2011 diff hist +238 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10449: Allow an H1 element to be described as a spinbutton or checkbox, etc
16 January 2011
- 08:2708:27, 16 January 2011 diff hist +142 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Why use cases are needed to justify allowing particular roles in particular situations
- 07:4507:45, 16 January 2011 diff hist +62 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Objections to Guiding factors for decisions on ARIA Role use
- 07:4307:43, 16 January 2011 diff hist +1,473 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for allowing roles on heading elements (H1-H6)
- 07:3407:34, 16 January 2011 diff hist +1,260 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for changes to command roles
- 06:4706:47, 16 January 2011 diff hist +543 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10493: Requesting additional prose in the HTML spec stating that certain roles defined in the ARIA spec have restrictions on their use defined in the ARIA spec
- 06:3906:39, 16 January 2011 diff hist −6 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Rationale
- 06:3806:38, 16 January 2011 diff hist +1 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bugs 8000 and 10448: Allow links to be described as scroll bars, buttons to be described as progress bars, etc
- 06:3806:38, 16 January 2011 diff hist −5 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bugs 8000 and 10448: Allow links to be described as scroll bars, buttons to be described as progress bars, etc
- 06:3806:38, 16 January 2011 diff hist +1 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bugs 8000 and 10448: Allow links to be described as scroll bars, buttons to be described as progress bars, etc
- 06:3806:38, 16 January 2011 diff hist +127 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10448: Allow links to be described as scroll bars, buttons to be described as progress bars, etc
- 06:3706:37, 16 January 2011 diff hist −167 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 8000: Allow authors to use elements in ways that contradict their semantics
- 06:3406:34, 16 January 2011 diff hist +141 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →The tables
- 06:2506:25, 16 January 2011 diff hist +332 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for the img elements deualt role being img [sic]
- 06:0706:07, 16 January 2011 diff hist +439 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Negative effects
- 05:5705:57, 16 January 2011 diff hist −1 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Negative effects
- 05:5405:54, 16 January 2011 diff hist +2,088 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10481: Set the default role of IMG elements to ARIA's "img" value
- 05:2105:21, 16 January 2011 diff hist +1,572 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Why use cases are needed to justify allowing particular roles in particular situations
- 03:2803:28, 16 January 2011 diff hist +24 Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 No edit summary
- 03:2603:26, 16 January 2011 diff hist +422 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10603: Confusion arising from an earlier attempt at resolving the aforementioned bugs
- 03:2203:22, 16 January 2011 diff hist +54 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10462: Merge the table defining strong native semantics and the table listing role and state constraints into a single table
15 January 2011
- 10:5310:53, 15 January 2011 diff hist +9 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 No edit summary
- 10:5110:51, 15 January 2011 diff hist +1,484 N Objections against CP for ISSUE-130 Created page with 'The change proposal cites GMail as an argument to support layout tables, but Google's opinion is that GMail's use of layout tables should be considered a bug. We do not have a pr...'
- 10:4110:41, 15 January 2011 diff hist −20,233 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 No edit summary
- 10:4110:41, 15 January 2011 diff hist +20,347 N Objections against CP for ISSUE-129 Created page with ' ''If there is objectionable material in the [http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ARIAinHTML5 other change proposal] that would be inappropriate to list in the above C...'
14 January 2011
- 23:5223:52, 14 January 2011 diff hist +156 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Process objections
- 23:5123:51, 14 January 2011 diff hist +235 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for addition of "References"
- 23:4623:46, 14 January 2011 diff hist +94 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10903: Requesting more introductory text
- 23:4523:45, 14 January 2011 diff hist +178 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10462: Merge the table defining strong native semantics and the table listing role and state constraints into a single table
- 23:4423:44, 14 January 2011 diff hist −101 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10603: ?
- 23:4023:40, 14 January 2011 diff hist +441 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Process objections
- 23:3823:38, 14 January 2011 diff hist −7 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for addition of "Guidance for User Agents"
- 23:3623:36, 14 January 2011 diff hist +267 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Process objections
- 23:3423:34, 14 January 2011 diff hist +60 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →The HTML to Platform Accessibility APIs Implementation Guide
- 23:3423:34, 14 January 2011 diff hist +1,908 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →The HTML to Platform Accessibility APIs Implementation Guide
- 23:2823:28, 14 January 2011 diff hist +112 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →The Guidance for User Agents section
- 23:2723:27, 14 January 2011 diff hist +692 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for addition of "Guidance for User Agents"
- 23:2723:27, 14 January 2011 diff hist −686 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to Guiding factors for decisions on ARIA Role use
- 23:2723:27, 14 January 2011 diff hist +686 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to Guiding factors for decisions on ARIA Role use
- 23:1923:19, 14 January 2011 diff hist +270 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →The Guidance for User Agents section
- 23:1823:18, 14 January 2011 diff hist +55 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →The tables
- 23:0423:04, 14 January 2011 diff hist +701 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Process objections
- 22:3922:39, 14 January 2011 diff hist +164 RelExtensions No edit summary
- 07:3107:31, 14 January 2011 diff hist +291 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Risks
- 07:3007:30, 14 January 2011 diff hist +274 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Risks
- 07:2807:28, 14 January 2011 diff hist +27 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Positive effects
- 07:2707:27, 14 January 2011 diff hist +393 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →...
- 06:1906:19, 14 January 2011 diff hist 0 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the Positive effects section
- 06:1806:18, 14 January 2011 diff hist +314 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the Positive effects section
- 06:1706:17, 14 January 2011 diff hist +315 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the Positive effects section
- 06:1506:15, 14 January 2011 diff hist +434 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Positive effects
- 06:1306:13, 14 January 2011 diff hist +396 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for addition of "WAI-ARIA and HTML5 Attributes" table
- 01:4601:46, 14 January 2011 diff hist −1 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →The tables
- 01:4501:45, 14 January 2011 diff hist +293 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →The tables
- 01:4201:42, 14 January 2011 diff hist −33 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Miscellaneous specifics
- 01:4101:41, 14 January 2011 diff hist +197 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →The tables
- 01:3801:38, 14 January 2011 diff hist +467 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10594: Move some requirements regarding ARIA attributes into a separate table
- 01:2501:25, 14 January 2011 diff hist +245 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Process objections
- 01:2401:24, 14 January 2011 diff hist +362 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →The tables
- 01:2101:21, 14 January 2011 diff hist +580 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for addition of "WAI-ARIA and HTML5 Attributes" table
- 01:1701:17, 14 January 2011 diff hist +56 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →The tables
- 01:1601:16, 14 January 2011 diff hist −527 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the rationale
- 01:1501:15, 14 January 2011 diff hist +734 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for changes to allowed roles on the a element
- 01:1101:11, 14 January 2011 diff hist +679 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10594: Move some requirements regarding ARIA attributes into a separate table
- 01:0401:04, 14 January 2011 diff hist +67 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10594: ???
- 00:5800:58, 14 January 2011 diff hist −1 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for defining h1 to h6 element that does have an hgroup ancestor
- 00:5700:57, 14 January 2011 diff hist +1,039 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the rationale
- 00:4400:44, 14 January 2011 diff hist −1 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10592: Request regarding the ARIA role of heading elements inside HGROUP elements
- 00:4400:44, 14 January 2011 diff hist +7 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10592: Request regarding the ARIA role of heading elements inside HGROUP elements
- 00:4400:44, 14 January 2011 diff hist +353 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10592: Request regarding the ARIA role of heading elements inside HGROUP elements
- 00:4000:40, 14 January 2011 diff hist +161 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for defining h1 to h6 element that does have an hgroup ancestor
- 00:3700:37, 14 January 2011 diff hist +615 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for defining h1 to h6 element that does have an hgroup ancestor
- 00:3300:33, 14 January 2011 diff hist 0 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10592: Request regarding the ARIA role of heading elements inside HGROUP elements
- 00:3200:32, 14 January 2011 diff hist −17 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Why use cases are needed to justify allowing particular roles in particular situations
- 00:3200:32, 14 January 2011 diff hist +136 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 No edit summary
- 00:3100:31, 14 January 2011 diff hist +334 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10592: ?
- 00:2900:29, 14 January 2011 diff hist +813 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for defining h1 to h6 element that does have an hgroup ancestor
- 00:2200:22, 14 January 2011 diff hist +4 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for defining h1 to h6 element that does have an hgroup ancestor
- 00:2100:21, 14 January 2011 diff hist +5 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Why use cases are needed to justify allowing particular roles in particular situations
- 00:2100:21, 14 January 2011 diff hist +5 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10449: Allow an H1 element to be described as a spinbutton or checkbox, etc
- 00:2000:20, 14 January 2011 diff hist +48 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Summary
- 00:2000:20, 14 January 2011 diff hist +94 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Positive effects
- 00:1800:18, 14 January 2011 diff hist +104 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objects to basis for changes to command roles
- 00:1600:16, 14 January 2011 diff hist +86 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10448: Allow links to be described as scroll bars, buttons to be described as progress bars, etc
- 00:1400:14, 14 January 2011 diff hist +2 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10448: Allow links to be described as scroll bars, buttons to be described as progress bars, etc
- 00:1400:14, 14 January 2011 diff hist +3,259 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Rationale
- 00:0900:09, 14 January 2011 diff hist +65 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10448: Allow links to be described as scroll bars, buttons to be described as progress bars, etc
- 00:0800:08, 14 January 2011 diff hist +24 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Impact
- 00:0700:07, 14 January 2011 diff hist +4 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for addition the merging of the tables in the current spec text [sic]
- 00:0700:07, 14 January 2011 diff hist +63 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for addition the merging of the tables in the current spec text [sic]
13 January 2011
- 23:5823:58, 13 January 2011 diff hist +14 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Why use cases are needed to justify allowing particular roles in particular situations
- 23:5823:58, 13 January 2011 diff hist −4 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Why use cases are needed to justify allowing particular roles in particular situations
- 23:5723:57, 13 January 2011 diff hist +573 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Why use cases are needed to justify allowing particular roles in particular situations
- 23:5523:55, 13 January 2011 diff hist −386 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10449: Allow an H1 element to be described as a spinbutton or checkbox, etc
- 23:5523:55, 13 January 2011 diff hist −386 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10448: Allow links to be described as scroll bars, buttons to be described as progress bars, etc
- 23:4223:42, 13 January 2011 diff hist +682 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10449: Allow an H1 element to be described as a spinbutton or checkbox, etc
- 23:4223:42, 13 January 2011 diff hist +386 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10448: Allow links to be described as scroll bars, buttons to be described as progress bars, etc
- 23:3723:37, 13 January 2011 diff hist +98 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Details
- 23:3623:36, 13 January 2011 diff hist 0 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10448: Allow links to be described as scroll bars, buttons to be described as progress bars, etc
- 23:3623:36, 13 January 2011 diff hist +90 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10448: Allow links to be described as scroll bars, buttons to be described as progress bars, etc
- 23:3623:36, 13 January 2011 diff hist +233 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10448: Allow links to be described as scroll bars, buttons to be described as progress bars, etc
- 23:3323:33, 13 January 2011 diff hist +1 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10462: Merge the table defining strong native semantics and the table listing role and state constraints into a single table
- 23:3223:32, 13 January 2011 diff hist +102 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10462: Merge the table defining strong native semantics and the table listing role and state constraints into a single table
- 23:3223:32, 13 January 2011 diff hist +857 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10462: Requesting that the non-normative summary be explicitly part of the normative table
- 23:2123:21, 13 January 2011 diff hist +2 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to basis for addition the merging of the tables in the current spec text [sic]
- 23:1823:18, 13 January 2011 diff hist +642 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the rationale
- 23:0923:09, 13 January 2011 diff hist +642 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the proposed text
- 23:0423:04, 13 January 2011 diff hist −7 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the rationale
- 23:0323:03, 13 January 2011 diff hist +371 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the rationale
- 22:5222:52, 13 January 2011 diff hist +245 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the other change proposal
- 19:3219:32, 13 January 2011 diff hist +1,196 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the rationale
- 18:3018:30, 13 January 2011 diff hist +2 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →References
- 18:3018:30, 13 January 2011 diff hist +31 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Impact
- 18:3018:30, 13 January 2011 diff hist +5 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →General points
- 18:2918:29, 13 January 2011 diff hist +937 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →General points
- 18:2318:23, 13 January 2011 diff hist +374 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →General points
- 18:1918:19, 13 January 2011 diff hist −1 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the rationale
- 18:1918:19, 13 January 2011 diff hist +1,094 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the other change proposal
- 18:0818:08, 13 January 2011 diff hist +627 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the other change proposal
- 18:0318:03, 13 January 2011 diff hist +732 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the other change proposal
- 18:0018:00, 13 January 2011 diff hist +692 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the other change proposal
- 17:5617:56, 13 January 2011 diff hist +395 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Rationale
- 08:3308:33, 13 January 2011 diff hist +812 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the other change proposal
- 07:4307:43, 13 January 2011 diff hist +207 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the other change proposal
- 07:1807:18, 13 January 2011 diff hist +2,202 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10444: Requesting a summary of all the elements that do not have a default ARIA role
- 00:5600:56, 13 January 2011 diff hist +1 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Rationale
- 00:5500:55, 13 January 2011 diff hist +1,095 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Rationale
- 00:3700:37, 13 January 2011 diff hist 0 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the other change proposal
- 00:3300:33, 13 January 2011 diff hist +72 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Rationale
- 00:3200:32, 13 January 2011 diff hist +89 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Details
- 00:3100:31, 13 January 2011 diff hist −2 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Bug 10449: Allowing an element to be described as a spinbutton or checkbox, etc
- 00:3100:31, 13 January 2011 diff hist +151 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Rationale
- 00:2900:29, 13 January 2011 diff hist +322 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Rationale
- 00:2600:26, 13 January 2011 diff hist +156 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the other change proposal
- 00:2500:25, 13 January 2011 diff hist +1,595 Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 →Objections to the other change proposal
- 00:0600:06, 13 January 2011 diff hist +505 N Change Proposal for ISSUE-129 Created page with '== Summary == Change nothing. == Rationale == == Details == Change nothing. == Impact == === Positive effects === === Negative effects === === Conformance Class Changes =...'
6 January 2011
5 January 2011
- 22:3122:31, 5 January 2011 diff hist 0 Specs/todo No edit summary
- 22:3122:31, 5 January 2011 diff hist +40 Specs/todo No edit summary
- 22:3122:31, 5 January 2011 diff hist 0 Specs No edit summary
- 22:3022:30, 5 January 2011 diff hist +12 Specs →Media-Independent Features
- 22:3022:30, 5 January 2011 diff hist +35 Specs →Media-Independent Layer
- 22:2822:28, 5 January 2011 diff hist 0 Specs No edit summary
- 22:2822:28, 5 January 2011 diff hist +62 Specs No edit summary
- 06:5006:50, 5 January 2011 diff hist −207 FAQ →How can I keep track of changes to the spec?
- 01:4201:42, 5 January 2011 diff hist +66 Specs/todo →DOM
- 01:4101:41, 5 January 2011 diff hist +75 Specs/todo →Specs to edit
30 December 2010
- 23:5323:53, 30 December 2010 diff hist −93 Specs No edit summary
- 05:2205:22, 30 December 2010 diff hist +115 Specs No edit summary
- 05:2105:21, 30 December 2010 diff hist +106 Specs No edit summary
- 05:1805:18, 30 December 2010 diff hist +700 Specs No edit summary
- 02:4102:41, 30 December 2010 diff hist +896 N Specs Created page with 'This wiki page lists all the specifications that a Web browser is likely to implement. For each spec, link the spec's title to the most up to date draft (typically the editor's ...'
- 02:3202:32, 30 December 2010 diff hist +48 Spec coordination No edit summary
- 01:2601:26, 30 December 2010 diff hist −149 m Main Page Reverted edits by Hearme (talk) to last revision by Philipj
8 December 2010
- 18:5318:53, 8 December 2010 diff hist +263 CanvasContexts No edit summary
29 November 2010
- 20:2620:26, 29 November 2010 diff hist +41 Specs/todo →Specs to edit
2 November 2010
- 00:5200:52, 2 November 2010 diff hist +25 Specs/todo →DOM
1 November 2010
- 16:5316:53, 1 November 2010 diff hist +619 Specs/todo →DOM
- 16:5216:52, 1 November 2010 diff hist +145 Specs/todo →MISC
19 October 2010
- 01:3801:38, 19 October 2010 diff hist +174 Specs/todo →MISC
4 October 2010
- 21:3221:32, 4 October 2010 diff hist −4 Presentations →Speakers