A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.

To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on IRC (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members) or send an e-mail to admin@wiki.whatwg.org with your desired username and an explanation of the first edit you'd like to make. (Do not use this e-mail address for any other inquiries, as they will be ignored or politely declined.)

Talk:Main Page

From WHATWG Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

WHATWG Specifications

  • I think this whole section should go. Problems should be categorised by what they apply to, not classified by which specification should solve them. The solution, not the problem, is bound to a particular specification. --Michel Fortin
    • I agree that problems shouldn't be categorised by the specification, but I don't agree this section should go. I think it's ok to provide some documentation about the actual specifications, including the actual features included within. It should be used to provide summaries and examples of actual features. Only when a proposal has been accepted and included in the spec, should it be included in this section. --Lachlan Hunt 22:03, 15 Nov 2006 (PST)

Terms, Acronyms and Abbreviations

  • I think this section too should go too. --Michel Fortin
    • I agree. If needed, we could create a glossary, but I don't think abbreviations and other terms should be on separate pages. --Lachlan Hunt 22:05, 15 Nov 2006 (PST)
      • I agree that this can be condensed to a single page, but I think we still need a page for this. A glossary is a good idea. --Matthew Raymond

nibbler-site-verification Claimed spec link does not link to a spec

valign="top" 
nibbler-site-verification
Used to verify ownership of Nibbler site
Nibbler site

Incomplete proposal
Claimed spec link does not link to a spec

can someone help in tell me what i need to do to get this ok