A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.

To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on IRC (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members) or send an e-mail to admin@wiki.whatwg.org with your desired username and an explanation of the first edit you'd like to make. (Do not use this e-mail address for any other inquiries, as they will be ignored or politely declined.)

Animation in HTML

From WHATWG Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Use a form of SMIL
Pros:

  • Already a W3C specification with an active Working Group and Activity
  • Existing tools and content use SMIL (two web browsers now support SVG+SMIL: Opera and Apple)
  • Microsoft has shown some interest in SMIL (HTML+TIME)

Use SMIL Timesheets with a link element
Pros:

  • Provides externally referenced 'timesheet' to define temporal behavior of document
  • Works for HTML without markup change (uses existing HTML:link element similar)
  • Spec currently in Working Draft status with an active Working Group and Activity
  • See example [1]

Apple's CSS animation proposal
Pros:

  • Already implemented by Apple in Safari
  • Works for HTML without markup changes.

Questions

  • Any patent-encumberances with Apple's proposal? They are willing to submit it to W3C
  • Has the "CSS animation proposal" been formalized in a spec, peer reviewed? Not yet
  • If "CSS animation" was chosen, would this effort become an additional activity of the HTML Working Group? Or would it be a separate proposal formalized by Apple with which the HTML WG would coordinate? CSS working group
  • The current proposal suggests CSS animation. Other than the fact that it's XML, are there any technical arguments against using SMIL (i.e. why is it considered the inferior choice)? SMIL requires markup changes to use, for stylistic effects