Talk:MetaExtensions: Revision history

15 July 2012

• curprev 03:0103:01, 15 July 2012‎ Martin.leese talk contribs‎ 22,910 bytes +1,343‎ →‎Dublin Core metadata: new section

14 July 2011

• curprev 07:2507:25, 14 July 2011‎ Hsivonen talk contribs‎ m 21,567 bytes +53‎ Forgot to sign
• curprev 07:2407:24, 14 July 2011‎ Hsivonen talk contribs‎ 21,514 bytes +387‎ →‎rights: why reversion: Duplication with the licensing microdata vocab

13 July 2011

• curprev 17:5417:54, 13 July 2011‎ BryanH talk contribs‎ 21,127 bytes +375‎ →‎rights: why reversion: clarify

5 February 2011

• curprev 03:3703:37, 5 February 2011‎ Nick talk contribs‎ 20,752 bytes +438‎ →‎Re: Proposed 'creator' MetaExtension: Replied.

2 February 2011

• curprev 18:3618:36, 2 February 2011‎ Codeguru413 talk contribs‎ 20,314 bytes +652‎ No edit summary
• curprev 18:2718:27, 2 February 2011‎ Codeguru413 talk contribs‎ 19,662 bytes +380‎ No edit summary

18 February 2010

• curprev 03:3003:30, 18 February 2010‎ Nick talk contribs‎ 19,282 bytes +306‎ →‎Mnewman's Feb. 12, 2010, deleted comments: new section
• curprev 03:1403:14, 18 February 2010‎ Nick talk contribs‎ 18,976 bytes +5,235‎ →‎Meta versus content: Replied.

12 February 2010

• curprev 17:0817:08, 12 February 2010‎ Mnewman talk contribs‎ 13,741 bytes −2,464‎ No edit summary
• curprev 15:4315:43, 12 February 2010‎ Mnewman talk contribs‎ 16,205 bytes +234‎ No edit summary
• curprev 15:4215:42, 12 February 2010‎ Mnewman talk contribs‎ 15,971 bytes +4,961‎ No edit summary

29 October 2009

• curprev 03:2603:26, 29 October 2009‎ Nick talk contribs‎ 11,010 bytes +4,511‎ →‎rights: why reversion

28 October 2009

• curprev 16:4716:47, 28 October 2009‎ BryanH talk contribs‎ 6,499 bytes +1,084‎ →‎rights: why reversion: rights
• curprev 07:5807:58, 28 October 2009‎ Nick talk contribs‎ 5,415 bytes +2,873‎ →‎rights: why reversion: new section

29 April 2009

• curprev 09:3509:35, 29 April 2009‎ Nick talk contribs‎ 2,542 bytes +476‎ →‎keywords and description should not be unendorsed, should they?: Answered.

20 April 2009

• curprev 08:5508:55, 20 April 2009‎ Nick talk contribs‎ 2,066 bytes +656‎ New section: keywords and description should not be unendorsed, should they?
• curprev 08:4508:45, 20 April 2009‎ Nick talk contribs‎ 1,410 bytes +805‎ →‎"description" meta name: Replied.

10 October 2008

• curprev 01:4601:46, 10 October 2008‎ Rfc2549 talk contribs‎ 605 bytes +115‎ →‎"description" meta name: update

25 May 2007

• curprev 13:4113:41, 25 May 2007‎ Aleksandersen talk contribs‎ 490 bytes +490‎ New page: == "description" meta name == I think the description name should be added to the HTML 5 specifications. Yes, search engines have made the keywords name obsolete. However search engines ar...