A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.
To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).
Animation in HTML: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: '''Use a form of SMIL''' * The existing proposal states using the "CSS animation proposal". I assume this is the proprietary, experimental form of animation put forth by Apple? What are...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* The existing proposal states using the "CSS animation proposal". I assume this is the proprietary, experimental form of animation put forth by Apple? What are the technical merits of the CSS animation proposal over SMIL? | * The existing proposal states using the "CSS animation proposal". I assume this is the proprietary, experimental form of animation put forth by Apple? What are the technical merits of the CSS animation proposal over SMIL? | ||
* Has the "CSS animation proposal" been formalized in a spec? Has it been peer reviewed? Why should the HTML group spend time and resources reviewing, editing a new proposal when an existing one exists? | * Has the "CSS animation proposal" been formalized in a spec? Has it been peer reviewed? Why should the HTML group spend time and resources reviewing, editing a new proposal when an existing one exists (SMIL)? | ||
* Assuming some form of SVG inline with HTML, since SVG can already be animated via SMIL, there would be two different ways of animating content. Why? | * Assuming some form of SVG inline with HTML, since SVG can already be animated via SMIL, there would be two different ways of animating content. Why? | ||
Revision as of 03:46, 30 March 2008
Use a form of SMIL
- The existing proposal states using the "CSS animation proposal". I assume this is the proprietary, experimental form of animation put forth by Apple? What are the technical merits of the CSS animation proposal over SMIL?
- Has the "CSS animation proposal" been formalized in a spec? Has it been peer reviewed? Why should the HTML group spend time and resources reviewing, editing a new proposal when an existing one exists (SMIL)?
- Assuming some form of SVG inline with HTML, since SVG can already be animated via SMIL, there would be two different ways of animating content. Why?