A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.

To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).

Bugzilla conventions: Difference between revisions

From WHATWG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
;'''<video>'''
;'''<video>'''
:bugs relating to  <video>, <audio>, HTMLMediaElement, Controller, WebVTT, WebRTC (PeerConnection and Stream), and closely related topics.
:bugs relating to  <video>, <audio>, HTMLMediaElement, Controller, WebVTT, WebRTC (PeerConnection and Stream), and closely related topics.
;'''<track>'''
:bugs relating to WebVTT and related topics.
;'''WF2:'''
;'''WF2:'''
:bugs relating to form controls.
:bugs relating to form controls.
Line 20: Line 22:
== Severities ==
== Severities ==


All bugs should be normal severity by default. Typos, grammar mistakes that don't affect normative status, and other such trivial matters can be marked "trivial". Feature requests should be marked "enhancement". Bugs that affect the parser algorithm should be marked "critical". Bugs that are immediately affecting implementors should be marked "blocker". "major" and "minor" are currently unused. The severity field is "owned" by the editor.
All bugs should be normal severity. Bugs that need dealing with ASAP (because they are blocking implementer work) should be marked blocker. I use other severities for prioritising important or less important bugs.
 
== Status Whiteboard ==
 
;'''reg'''
:something related to the rel, meta, or other registries (and probably pending a decision on how to deal with them all)
;A single letter value
:part of a temporary grouping (e.g. so I can deal with related bugs together)


== Components ==
== Components ==
Line 42: Line 51:
== Bookmarklets ==
== Bookmarklets ==


If you're editing the spec you may find these useful:
If you're helping with the bugs you may find [http://junkyard.damowmow.com/472 these bookmarlets] useful.
 
[javascript:document.getElementsByTagName('textarea')%5B0%5D.value%20%2B%3D%20%22EDITOR'S%20RESPONSE%3A%20This%20is%20an%20Editor's%20Response%20to%20your%20comment.%20If%20you%20are%20satisfied%20with%20this%20response%2C%20please%20change%20the%20state%20of%20this%20bug%20to%20CLOSED.%20If%20you%20have%20additional%20information%20and%20would%20like%20the%20editor%20to%20reconsider%2C%20please%20reopen%20this%20bug.%20If%20you%20would%20like%20to%20escalate%20the%20issue%20to%20the%20full%20HTML%20Working%20Group%2C%20please%20add%20the%20TrackerRequest%20keyword%20to%20this%20bug%2C%20and%20suggest%20title%20and%20text%20for%20the%20tracker%20issue%3B%20or%20you%20may%20create%20a%20tracker%20issue%20yourself%2C%20if%20you%20are%20able%20to%20do%20so.%20For%20more%20details%2C%20see%20this%20document%3A%5Cn%20%20%20http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2Fhtml5%2Fdecision-policy%2Fdecision-policy.html%5Cn%5CnStatus%3A%20Rejected%5CnChange%20Description%3A%20no%20spec%20change%5CnRationale%3A%20%22%3B%20document.changeform.bug_status.value%20%3D%20'RESOLVED'%3B%20document.changeform.resolution.value%20%3D%20'WONTFIX'%3B%20document.getElementById('resolution_settings').className%20%3D%20''%3B%20undefined Reject]
[javascript:document.getElementsByTagName('textarea')%5B0%5D.value%20%2B%3D%20%22EDITOR'S%20RESPONSE%3A%20This%20is%20an%20Editor's%20Response%20to%20your%20comment.%20If%20you%20are%20satisfied%20with%20this%20response%2C%20please%20change%20the%20state%20of%20this%20bug%20to%20CLOSED.%20If%20you%20have%20additional%20information%20and%20would%20like%20the%20editor%20to%20reconsider%2C%20please%20reopen%20this%20bug.%20If%20you%20would%20like%20to%20escalate%20the%20issue%20to%20the%20full%20HTML%20Working%20Group%2C%20please%20add%20the%20TrackerRequest%20keyword%20to%20this%20bug%2C%20and%20suggest%20title%20and%20text%20for%20the%20tracker%20issue%3B%20or%20you%20may%20create%20a%20tracker%20issue%20yourself%2C%20if%20you%20are%20able%20to%20do%20so.%20For%20more%20details%2C%20see%20this%20document%3A%5Cn%20%20%20http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2Fhtml5%2Fdecision-policy%2Fdecision-policy.html%5Cn%5CnStatus%3A%20Accepted%5CnChange%20Description%3A%20no%20spec%20change%5CnRationale%3A%20This%20seems%20to%20have%20been%20fixed%20already.%22%3B%20document.changeform.bug_status.value%20%3D%20'RESOLVED'%3B%20document.changeform.resolution.value%20%3D%20'WORKSFORME'%3B%20document.getElementById('resolution_settings').className%20%3D%20''%3B%20undefined Already done]
[javascript:document.getElementsByTagName('textarea')%5B0%5D.value%20%2B%3D%20%22EDITOR'S%20RESPONSE%3A%20This%20is%20an%20Editor's%20Response%20to%20your%20comment.%20If%20you%20are%20satisfied%20with%20this%20response%2C%20please%20change%20the%20state%20of%20this%20bug%20to%20CLOSED.%20If%20you%20have%20additional%20information%20and%20would%20like%20the%20editor%20to%20reconsider%2C%20please%20reopen%20this%20bug.%20If%20you%20would%20like%20to%20escalate%20the%20issue%20to%20the%20full%20HTML%20Working%20Group%2C%20please%20add%20the%20TrackerRequest%20keyword%20to%20this%20bug%2C%20and%20suggest%20title%20and%20text%20for%20the%20tracker%20issue%3B%20or%20you%20may%20create%20a%20tracker%20issue%20yourself%2C%20if%20you%20are%20able%20to%20do%20so.%20For%20more%20details%2C%20see%20this%20document%3A%5Cn%20%20%20http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2Fhtml5%2Fdecision-policy%2Fdecision-policy.html%5Cn%5CnStatus%3A%20Did%20Not%20Understand%20Request%5CnChange%20Description%3A%20no%20spec%20change%5CnRationale%3A%20I%20don't%20understand.%20Could%20you%20elaborate%3F%22%3B%20document.changeform.bug_status.value%20%3D%20'RESOLVED'%3B%20document.changeform.resolution.value%20%3D%20'NEEDSINFO'%3B%20document.getElementById('resolution_settings').className%20%3D%20''%3B%20undefined Ask fore more info]

Latest revision as of 17:30, 2 November 2011

These are the conventions used for bugs filed in the W3C Bugzilla for specs also maintained by the WHATWG.

Subject prefixes

Some specific topics have prefixes in the bug summaries to help group the bugs.

<video>
bugs relating to <video>, <audio>, HTMLMediaElement, Controller, WebVTT, WebRTC (PeerConnection and Stream), and closely related topics.
<track>
bugs relating to WebVTT and related topics.
WF2:
bugs relating to form controls.
WF3:
feature requests relating to form controls.
PUB:
something relating to the spec publication process (including anolis, spec splitter, the START and END markers, etc)

Priorities

See bug priority policy according to the chairs. Initial commenters are only allowed to set priority to P3 or lower. Editors and editorial assistants can change it freely. Chairs can decide on a final priority. P1 is very urgent. P2 or P3 is for technical comments except possibly feature requests. P4 or P5 is editorial or non-technical, or feature requests.

Severities

All bugs should be normal severity. Bugs that need dealing with ASAP (because they are blocking implementer work) should be marked blocker. I use other severities for prioritising important or less important bugs.

Status Whiteboard

reg
something related to the rel, meta, or other registries (and probably pending a decision on how to deal with them all)
A single letter value
part of a temporary grouping (e.g. so I can deal with related bugs together)

Components

The bug filing system should automatically pick the right component. The components are pretty self-explanatory. WHATWG-specific issues should be moved to the "other Hixie drafts" component.

Resolutions

The boilerplate used when resolving the bug comes from: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0680.html

The requirements for use of different resolutions are here:

http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v2.html#bug-resolutions

Helpful query links

Bookmarklets

If you're helping with the bugs you may find these bookmarlets useful.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.whatwg.org/index.php?title=Bugzilla_conventions&oldid=7551"