A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.
To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).
User contributions for Yroc
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
16 October 2013
- 18:4718:47, 16 October 2013 diff hist +2,450 Rationale →Rejected proposals: Proposed dli element
- 18:0818:08, 16 October 2013 diff hist +87 Rationale →Why is everything else around us developing so fast, but the web is so slow to adopt anything?: Added reference
12 October 2013
- 20:1320:13, 12 October 2013 diff hist −5 Rationale →Why is everything else around us developing so fast, but the web is so slow to adopt anything?: removed extraneous ref tag
- 20:1220:12, 12 October 2013 diff hist +692 Rationale →General Rationale: New heading added "Why is everything else around us developing so fast, but the web is so slow to adopt anything?"
- 19:5819:58, 12 October 2013 diff hist +41 m Rationale →Member and contributor feedback: removal of extraneous word, "feedback" defined more specifically
- 19:4619:46, 12 October 2013 diff hist +81 Rationale →In overall terms, what determines what’s in the spec?: Added subheadings
5 March 2013
- 20:4020:40, 5 March 2013 diff hist +6 m Rationale →Why isn’t there a dedicated element for advertisements? (e.g., <ad>, or <advert>, or <banner>, or whatever): inserted missing closing </pre>
- 20:3420:34, 5 March 2013 diff hist +320 Rationale →Why isn’t there a dedicated element for advertisements? (e.g., <ad>, or <advert>, or <banner>, or whatever): Added dialog from newsgroup
- 20:2420:24, 5 March 2013 diff hist +1 m Rationale →Why isn’t there a dedicated element for advertisements? (e.g., <ad>, or <advert>, or <banner>, or whatever): styling change
- 20:2320:23, 5 March 2013 diff hist +303 Rationale →Why isn’t there a dedicated element for advertisements? (e.g., <ad> or <advert>): Added relevant dialog from mailing list
- 20:1420:14, 5 March 2013 diff hist +529 Rationale →Why isn’t there a dedicated element for advertisements? (e.g., <ad> or <advert>): Added relevant dialog from mailing list
23 February 2013
- 15:5215:52, 23 February 2013 diff hist +30 m FAQ →How can I keep track of changes to the spec?: grammer cleanup
22 February 2013
- 05:3205:32, 22 February 2013 diff hist +178 Rationale →Why should the spec suggest any one specific method for marking up comments?: added an in page reference
17 February 2013
- 23:3723:37, 17 February 2013 diff hist +86 Rationale →Why should the spec suggest any one specific method for marking up comments?: Added reference
- 23:2923:29, 17 February 2013 diff hist +541 Rationale →A “<comment>” element for marking up user comments (i.e., user compositions in response to newspaper or magazine articles, blog entries, discussion topics, status updates, images, videos, etc.): Added new section
- 23:1923:19, 17 February 2013 diff hist +1,487 Rationale →A “<comment>” element for marking up user comments (i.e., user compositions in response to newspaper or magazine articles, blog entries, discussion topics, status updates, images, videos, etc.): Several new sections added
- 22:3622:36, 17 February 2013 diff hist −2,025 Rationale →But comments are not articles: filled out section
- 19:0119:01, 17 February 2013 diff hist +80 Rationale →Why isn’t there a dedicated element for user comments? (e.g., <comment>): Renamed heading
- 14:0014:00, 17 February 2013 diff hist +997 Rationale →General Rationale: Added new section "In overall terms, what determines what's in the spec?"
15 February 2013
- 15:3415:34, 15 February 2013 diff hist +6 m Rationale →The blockquote element: markup correction