A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.
To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).
Talk:Sanitization rules
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Is the data URI scheme safe?
- Rob Sayre says no and refers to a wikipedia article; however, I cannot see anything in the article that indicates the scheme is not safe.
- Looking at that wikipedia page,
datacould only be added if it were followed by an asterisk, kinda like the 756* that I see popping up all over the place these days. In particular, I don't see the use case which would justify the investment in sanitizingtext/htmlencoded as a data URI. Not that it would be difficult, just hard to justify. Perhaps a section could be added which lists safe content types when included in data URIs. -- Rubys 03:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Looking at that wikipedia page,