A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.
To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).
Talk:RelExtensions
Memorandum of understanding
This Web page and associated Web services, if any, are provided with the understanding that providing them is cheap and relatively reliable, and that the URIs for these resources will not change after HTML5's completion, unless circumstances outside of the administrator's control force such a change.
Organisations that believe these pages to be of vital importance are encouraged to put aside funds for the defence of this page should the need arise.
--Hixie 23:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
XFN noise
Could XFN relations be separated? I'm under impression that they inflate the list.
- I think that they should be removed, or moved to a microformat list where they would be named eg
xfn.friend. I also want to emphasize that I dislike XFN as it implies to complex relation, that can be hard to resolve. For example "the maintaner of that document had that relation to the maintaner of the referenced document when the document was last edited/created" is not a good example of a relation. If we assume one knows the maintainer of the current document, how is one to know who the maintainer of the referenced document is? Someone could also be confused by the name of the relation and think that the current resource if a friend of the author…
Re: shortlink
shortlink has also been proposed (on the blagosphere) as shorter and shorturl