A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.
To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).
User contributions for Yroc
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
16 July 2015
- 18:2618:26, 16 July 2015 diff hist +135 Rationale →Already-implemented features: General rewording for clarification
22 January 2014
- 23:4523:45, 22 January 2014 diff hist −46 m Rationale →Why isn’t there an element for user comments? (e.g., <comment>): grammar
- 23:4223:42, 22 January 2014 diff hist −2 Rationale →Modifying existing semantics: removed reference to specific HTML version (HTML 4 -> HTML)
16 October 2013
- 18:5918:59, 16 October 2013 diff hist +84 Rationale →Why isn’t there a grouping-type element for description lists to represent individual name-value groups (e.g., a “dli” element)? It would make styling as well as adding microdata to individual groups much easier.: Added referen
- 18:5418:54, 16 October 2013 diff hist +42 m Rationale →custom HTML elements: Rephrased heading in the form of a question
- 18:5018:50, 16 October 2013 diff hist −1 m Rationale →But comments are not articles: grammatical correction
- 18:4718:47, 16 October 2013 diff hist +2,450 Rationale →Rejected proposals: Proposed dli element
- 18:0818:08, 16 October 2013 diff hist +87 Rationale →Why is everything else around us developing so fast, but the web is so slow to adopt anything?: Added reference
12 October 2013
- 20:1320:13, 12 October 2013 diff hist −5 Rationale →Why is everything else around us developing so fast, but the web is so slow to adopt anything?: removed extraneous ref tag
- 20:1220:12, 12 October 2013 diff hist +692 Rationale →General Rationale: New heading added "Why is everything else around us developing so fast, but the web is so slow to adopt anything?"
- 19:5819:58, 12 October 2013 diff hist +41 m Rationale →Member and contributor feedback: removal of extraneous word, "feedback" defined more specifically
- 19:4619:46, 12 October 2013 diff hist +81 Rationale →In overall terms, what determines what’s in the spec?: Added subheadings
5 March 2013
- 20:4020:40, 5 March 2013 diff hist +6 m Rationale →Why isn’t there a dedicated element for advertisements? (e.g., <ad>, or <advert>, or <banner>, or whatever): inserted missing closing </pre>
- 20:3420:34, 5 March 2013 diff hist +320 Rationale →Why isn’t there a dedicated element for advertisements? (e.g., <ad>, or <advert>, or <banner>, or whatever): Added dialog from newsgroup
- 20:2420:24, 5 March 2013 diff hist +1 m Rationale →Why isn’t there a dedicated element for advertisements? (e.g., <ad>, or <advert>, or <banner>, or whatever): styling change
- 20:2320:23, 5 March 2013 diff hist +303 Rationale →Why isn’t there a dedicated element for advertisements? (e.g., <ad> or <advert>): Added relevant dialog from mailing list
- 20:1420:14, 5 March 2013 diff hist +529 Rationale →Why isn’t there a dedicated element for advertisements? (e.g., <ad> or <advert>): Added relevant dialog from mailing list
23 February 2013
- 15:5215:52, 23 February 2013 diff hist +30 m FAQ →How can I keep track of changes to the spec?: grammer cleanup
22 February 2013
- 05:3205:32, 22 February 2013 diff hist +178 Rationale →Why should the spec suggest any one specific method for marking up comments?: added an in page reference
17 February 2013
- 23:3723:37, 17 February 2013 diff hist +86 Rationale →Why should the spec suggest any one specific method for marking up comments?: Added reference
- 23:2923:29, 17 February 2013 diff hist +541 Rationale →A “<comment>” element for marking up user comments (i.e., user compositions in response to newspaper or magazine articles, blog entries, discussion topics, status updates, images, videos, etc.): Added new section
- 23:1923:19, 17 February 2013 diff hist +1,487 Rationale →A “<comment>” element for marking up user comments (i.e., user compositions in response to newspaper or magazine articles, blog entries, discussion topics, status updates, images, videos, etc.): Several new sections added
- 22:3622:36, 17 February 2013 diff hist −2,025 Rationale →But comments are not articles: filled out section
- 19:0119:01, 17 February 2013 diff hist +80 Rationale →Why isn’t there a dedicated element for user comments? (e.g., <comment>): Renamed heading
- 14:0014:00, 17 February 2013 diff hist +997 Rationale →General Rationale: Added new section "In overall terms, what determines what's in the spec?"
15 February 2013
- 15:3415:34, 15 February 2013 diff hist +6 m Rationale →The blockquote element: markup correction
- 15:3315:33, 15 February 2013 diff hist +66 Rationale →Grouping content: reformatted heading in form of a question
13 February 2013
- 17:4617:46, 13 February 2013 diff hist +1,744 Rationale →General Rationale: Added new section "Why stick to semantics..."
- 17:1717:17, 13 February 2013 diff hist +1,971 Rationale →General Rationale: Added new section "Purpose of defining elements semantically"
- 14:4414:44, 13 February 2013 diff hist −7 m Rationale →DOCTYPE (Document Type Declaration): minor style change
4 February 2013
- 21:2521:25, 4 February 2013 diff hist +616 Rationale →Document metadata: Added subsection "Inclusion of keyword
- 20:5220:52, 4 February 2013 diff hist +478 Rationale →Document metadata: Added subsection "Inclusion of application-name..."
- 20:3020:30, 4 February 2013 diff hist +393 Rationale →Specific Elements: Added "Document metadata" and "meta charset" sections
2 February 2013
- 19:0719:07, 2 February 2013 diff hist +1 m Rationale →Why isn’t there a sandbox attribute on the html element: Added question mark to heading
- 19:0719:07, 2 February 2013 diff hist +26 m Rationale →sandbox attribute on the html element: Altered heading
- 19:0519:05, 2 February 2013 diff hist +76 Rationale →A dedicated element for advertisements: Altered heading
- 18:5718:57, 2 February 2013 diff hist +8 m Rationale →Why isn’t there a dedicated element for user comments? (e.g., comment): style change in heading
- 18:5618:56, 2 February 2013 diff hist +52 Rationale →A dedicated element for user comments: Altered headline
- 17:5617:56, 2 February 2013 diff hist +38 m Rationale Added todo
- 17:5417:54, 2 February 2013 diff hist −29 m Rationale →Modifying existing semantics: Punctuation cleanup
- 15:1815:18, 2 February 2013 diff hist −1 m Rationale →General Rationale: Removed extraneous line break
- 15:1415:14, 2 February 2013 diff hist −858 Rationale →meter and progress (are not the same thing): Removed broken image links
- 15:1115:11, 2 February 2013 diff hist −1,260 Rationale →b, i, em, strong, and mark: Section removed -- does not provide any rationale information
- 01:1301:13, 2 February 2013 diff hist +52 Rationale Added external link to spec
- 01:0501:05, 2 February 2013 diff hist −20 Rationale Reworded intro paragraph
1 February 2013
- 12:1412:14, 1 February 2013 diff hist +77 m Rationale →DOCTYPE: Grammar cleanup