A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.
To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).
XHTML2 versus HTML5: Difference between revisions
m (→the dl, di, dt and dd elements: another one) |
|||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
'''Rationale:''' XXX | '''Rationale:''' XXX | ||
=== | === The dl, di, dt and dd elements === | ||
HTML5 does not have the di element. (HTML5 is much clearer in defining this, by the way.) | HTML5 does not have the di element. (HTML5 is much clearer in defining this, by the way.) | ||
Revision as of 18:34, 23 January 2009
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/ED-xhtml-modularization2-20090123/
This page is an attempt to find out where XHTML2 and HTML5 features overlap, why certain design decisions in HTML5 have been made different, and why HTML5 lacks certain features XHTML2 has.
It is not an attempt to demonstrate that 5 > 2. We know that.
It is also very simple at this point. I wish my time was infinite.
XHTML Document Module
The html element
XHTML2 has version="" and xsi:schemaLocation="". HTML5 has neither.
Rationale: HTML5 does away with versioning in HTML defining it equivalent to CSS in that regard. XXX add something nice about why we do not have xsi:schemaLocation=""
The head element
XHTML2 has profile="". HTML5 has not.
Rationale: it does not appear to be used in the wild.
Note: this is still being debated by the HTML WG.
XHTML Structural Module
The blockcode element
HTML5 does not have this element. In HTML5 you can use <pre><code> instead.
Rationale: the blockcode element is not backwards compatible.
The heading elements
HTML5 does not have the h element. In HTML5 the h1-h6 elements work together with the section element. In XHTML2 only the h element works with the section element.
Rationale: the h element is not backwards compatible. Also, it seems important to define interaction between the h1-h6 elements and the section element so authors can more easily reuse existing content and assistive technology can still make sense of invalid pages.
The separator element
HTML5 does not have the separator element. It does have the hr element which means and does the same thing.
Rationale: the separator element is not backwards compatible and we cannot do away with the hr element so adding an equivalent element would just make matters more complex.
XHTML Text Module
The abbr element
XHTML2 has a full attribute that can reference another element which provides the expansion (within the same page). HTML5 does not. HTML5 does this implicitly by comparing element contents.
Rationale: Less work for authors.
The l element
XXX The XHTML2 open issues list says that the br element will be added back. Does this element stay though?
XHTML Hypertext Module
XXX This module talks about adding the access element to the head element, but the link is broken.
XHTML List Module
HTML5 does not have a a caption element to annotate list items.
Rationale: XXX
The dl, di, dt and dd elements
HTML5 does not have the di element. (HTML5 is much clearer in defining this, by the way.)
Rationale: the di element solves a styling problem.
The nl element
HTML5 does not have the nl element.
Rationale: XXX