A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.
To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).
Talk:Layout tables: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Most of the difficulty with CSS is caused by incomplete IE's implementation (notably lack of <code>display:table-cell</code>). Specyfing even more advanced table-like constructs won't impr...) |
(CSS 3 Advanced Layout Module) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
And of course there's no reason to tie this layout to particular element names, so this proposal belongs to CSS and is out of scope of HTML. | And of course there's no reason to tie this layout to particular element names, so this proposal belongs to CSS and is out of scope of HTML. | ||
==CSS 3 Advanced Layout Module== | |||
A far better solution to the dilemma is [http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-layout The CSS 3 Advanced Layout Module]. Do '''not''' re-introduce presentational markup!--[[User:Itpastorn|Itpastorn]] 13:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:52, 22 August 2007
Most of the difficulty with CSS is caused by incomplete IE's implementation (notably lack of display:table-cell). Specyfing even more advanced table-like constructs won't improve IE6's implementation a bit.
And of course there's no reason to tie this layout to particular element names, so this proposal belongs to CSS and is out of scope of HTML.
CSS 3 Advanced Layout Module
A far better solution to the dilemma is The CSS 3 Advanced Layout Module. Do not re-introduce presentational markup!--Itpastorn 13:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)