A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.
To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).
DOM XPath: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Add pointers) |
No edit summary |
||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Web IDL definitions in https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#xpath. | |||
* Integrate the XPath part of the section [ | If someone ever decides to write down DOM XPath (i.e. a proper version of the [https://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-XPath/xpath.html DOM3XPath note]), take this into account: | ||
* Make it clear that contrary to XPath 1.0 multiple Text nodes can indeed be returned, even if they are siblings. The DOM is not the XML InfoSet. (As is the case in WebKit and Gecko today.) | |||
* Simplifications: | * Integrate the XPath part of the section [https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/infrastructure.html#interactions-with-xpath-and-xslt with XPath and XSLT] from HTML. | ||
* Make it clear that contrary to [https://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xpath-19991116/ XPath 1.0] multiple Text nodes can indeed be returned, even if they are siblings. The DOM is not the XML InfoSet. (As is the case in WebKit and Gecko today.) | |||
* Make it clear that contrary to [https://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xpath-19991116/ XPath 1.0] the root of the tree is the Document (and not the root element). This means you can return the parent of the root element (can you get all types of siblings? comments, PIs, doctypes? probably, but untested). | |||
* Simplifications: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0310.html | |||
* Exceptions: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743888 | * Exceptions: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743888 | ||
[[Category:Spec coordination]] | [[Category:Spec coordination]] | ||
Latest revision as of 08:59, 30 August 2019
Web IDL definitions in https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#xpath.
If someone ever decides to write down DOM XPath (i.e. a proper version of the DOM3XPath note), take this into account:
- Integrate the XPath part of the section with XPath and XSLT from HTML.
- Make it clear that contrary to XPath 1.0 multiple Text nodes can indeed be returned, even if they are siblings. The DOM is not the XML InfoSet. (As is the case in WebKit and Gecko today.)
- Make it clear that contrary to XPath 1.0 the root of the tree is the Document (and not the root element). This means you can return the parent of the root element (can you get all types of siblings? comments, PIs, doctypes? probably, but untested).
- Simplifications: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0310.html
- Exceptions: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743888