A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.
To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).
Component Model Use Cases: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
And <tt>x-foo</tt> is instantiated from this template: | And <tt>x-foo</tt> is instantiated from this template: | ||
<pre | <pre> | ||
<template> | <template> | ||
<span> | <span> |
Revision as of 22:46, 16 December 2010
Component Model (aka XBL2) Use Cases
WORK IN PROGRESS
A canonical set of uses cases that represents the set of problems we are trying to solve by implementing a component model. For implementation details, see XBL2 Spec.
Built-in HTML Elements and Their Behaviors
Does:
- provide a uniform way to browsers to implement complex HTML elements, such as video/audio, sliders, progress elements, etc. possibly using scripting.
- provide light-weight implementations of specialized markup languages
Needs:
- shadow DOM
- UA-level attachment
- ability to designate and use DOM SPIs only within the shadow scope
- ability to completely hide implementation details from author and user
- restricted post-UA-level styling using pseudoclasses
- style/event propagation control at the borders of the shadow DOM
- high performance, especially compared to native implementation
Could use:
- declarative templating/binding
Doesn't care:
- mutable templates
- dynamic attachment/detachment
- template inheritance
- attachment using CSS or DOM
- content element (output ports), since they can't have children (this may change)
- attribute/pseudo forwarding
- xml:base handling
Interesting scenarios:
- If an input range element is implemented using this functionality, what happens to its shadow DOM if author attempts to add shadow DOM to that element?
- Implement a video/audio element. How can the binding reach into a private supporting API that is not available to the author?
Custom Widget System
Does:
- provide a uniform way (i.e. DOM) to declare widget APIs
- encapsulate widget implementation details
- enable control over how styles and events outside of a widget affect it
- enable widget styling primitives
- asynchronously instantiate and initialize widgets (for instance, display a widget without starting up a script context, then progressively enhance with script).
- allow seamless reuse a widget written using various libraries or frameworks
- allow using widgets declaratively, with minimal knowledge of the underlying implementation
- provide a way to create new widgets by extending existing widgets
Needs:
- shadow DOM
- content element (output ports)
- style/event propagation control at the borders of the shadow DOM
- attachment using CSS and DOM
- separate instantiation and binding phases (or another way to allow asynchronous binding)
- attribute/pseudo forwarding
- declarative templating/binding
Could use:
- dynamic attachment/detachment
- template inheritance
Doesn't care:
- mutable templates
- xml:base handling
Interesting scenarios:
- Implement a "polaroid frame" widget? This widget, when bound to any element would display its contents in a Polaroid(tm)-like frame.
- Suppose the widget system has a centralized "settings" widget, with which all other widgets should communicate to add their settings. Implement this communication, provided that all widgets are opaque elements.
- Implement a "tab set" widget. As you add "tabs" to it, tab titles appear in a row at the top, and tab contents appear in the main area, only visible when the corresponding tab title is selected.
- Tens of Thousands of Widgets. The implementation should be able to efficiently handle a very large number of instances from the same template (see discussion).
Notes on output ports:
- Output ports need to be insertion points, not cointainers. If the output port is a container (that is, an existing element in the shadow subtree is designated as a place to add the "light" nodes), some layout scenarios aren't possible. In this example, you can not use flexbox to layout all of the paragraphs in the story:
<template> <p>Once upon a time, <content includes="p"> <p>And they lived happily ever after </template>
It is useful to think of the output port as a collapsed range.
- Shadow subtree mutation. Because content element is an insertion point, what happens when the elements around it change? What happens when the insertion point moves?
- Modifying includes attribute. What happens when you modify the includes element on the output port?
- Nested shadow subtrees. Suppose you have an element x-bar, instantiated from this template:
<template> <div> <x-foo> <span>Blah</span> <content includes="*"> </x-foo> </div>
And x-foo is instantiated from this template:
<template> <span> <content includes="*"> </span> </template>
Sequence of actions:
- Add a div element to x-bar.
- Move content element in x-bar template as the first child of div
What happens?
Layout Manager
Does:
- provide a framework for client-side restructuring of content to accommodate layout
- support both imperative a declarative layout models
- provide templating/theming capabilities
Needs:
- shadow DOM
- content element (output ports)
- attachment using CSS and DOM
- separate instantiation and binding phases (or another way to allow asynchronous binding)
Could use:
Doesn't care:
- mutable templates
- xml:base handling