A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.
To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).
User talk:Hixie: Difference between revisions
Yecril71pl (talk | contribs) (New section: Do not relegate discussion to IRC) |
(New section: rel="nofollow") |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
While I am at that, thanks for adding at least some text that makes sense for Microsoft Outlook users. | While I am at that, thanks for adding at least some text that makes sense for Microsoft Outlook users. | ||
--[[User:Yecril71pl|Yecril71pl]] 08:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC) | --[[User:Yecril71pl|Yecril71pl]] 08:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
== rel="nofollow" == | |||
Hi, | |||
I don't know if it is a feature request,but i read on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow wikipedia] that rel="nofollow" is actual in use. will this become a standard?/is there a discussion about this? should we make a wiki page? --[[User:Mabdul|Mabdul]] 11:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:26, 1 December 2008
With regards to spam-bots
I would recommend enabling captchas during the registration process to stem the flood of nonsense accounts that are spamming the wiki. This can be done with the ConfirmEdit extension. — Edward Z. Yang(Talk) 19:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
it's not clear to me that the spammers aren't humans
Do not relegate discussion to IRC
The summary of your edit at FAQ is inappropriate. IRC discussion should not be required for editing. MediaWiki has better mechanisms for that.
While I am at that, thanks for adding at least some text that makes sense for Microsoft Outlook users. --Yecril71pl 08:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
rel="nofollow"
Hi, I don't know if it is a feature request,but i read on wikipedia that rel="nofollow" is actual in use. will this become a standard?/is there a discussion about this? should we make a wiki page? --Mabdul 11:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)