A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.

To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).

Difference between revisions of "Talk:MetaExtensions"

From WHATWG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: == "description" meta name == I think the description name should be added to the HTML 5 specifications. Yes, search engines have made the keywords name obsolete. However search engines ar...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== "description" meta name ==
== "description" meta name ==
I think the description name should be added to the HTML 5 specifications. Yes, search engines have made the keywords name obsolete. However search engines are not ''that'' good. It is still only the document author that can provide a reliable, short description of the documents contents. I think there should be constrains on how long, what it contains, and the structure of the description. Short sentences, and plain English descriptions would be the best.
I think the description name should be added to the HTML 5 specifications. Yes, search engines have made the keywords name obsolete. However search engines are not ''that'' good. It is still only the document author that can provide a reliable, short description of the documents contents. I think there should be constrains on how long, what it contains, and the structure of the description. Short sentences, and plain English descriptions would be the best.
:It looks like "description" is in the latest specification. [[User:Rfc2549|Rfc2549]] 01:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:46, 10 October 2008

"description" meta name

I think the description name should be added to the HTML 5 specifications. Yes, search engines have made the keywords name obsolete. However search engines are not that good. It is still only the document author that can provide a reliable, short description of the documents contents. I think there should be constrains on how long, what it contains, and the structure of the description. Short sentences, and plain English descriptions would be the best.

It looks like "description" is in the latest specification. Rfc2549 01:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC)