A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.

To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on IRC (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From WHATWG Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Sections that should go...)
 
(WHATWG Specifications)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== WHATWG Specifications ==
 
== WHATWG Specifications ==
  
I think this whole section should go. Problems should be categorised by what they apply to, not classified by which specification should solve them. The solution, not the problem, is bound to a particular specification. --[[User:Michel Fortin|Michel Fortin]]
+
* I think this whole section should go. Problems should be categorised by what they apply to, not classified by which specification should solve them. The solution, not the problem, is bound to a particular specification. --[[User:Michel Fortin|Michel Fortin]]
 +
** I agree that problems shouldn't be categorised by the specification, but I don't agree this section should go.  I think it's ok to provide some documentation about the actual specifications, including the actual features included within.  It should be used to provide summaries and examples of actual features.  Only when a proposal has been accepted and included in the spec, should it be included in this section. --[[User:Lachlan Hunt|Lachlan Hunt]] 22:03, 15 Nov 2006 (PST)
  
 
== Terms, Acronyms and Abbreviations ==
 
== Terms, Acronyms and Abbreviations ==
  
 
I think this section too should go too. --[[User:Michel Fortin|Michel Fortin]]
 
I think this section too should go too. --[[User:Michel Fortin|Michel Fortin]]

Revision as of 06:03, 16 November 2006

WHATWG Specifications

  • I think this whole section should go. Problems should be categorised by what they apply to, not classified by which specification should solve them. The solution, not the problem, is bound to a particular specification. --Michel Fortin
    • I agree that problems shouldn't be categorised by the specification, but I don't agree this section should go. I think it's ok to provide some documentation about the actual specifications, including the actual features included within. It should be used to provide summaries and examples of actual features. Only when a proposal has been accepted and included in the spec, should it be included in this section. --Lachlan Hunt 22:03, 15 Nov 2006 (PST)

Terms, Acronyms and Abbreviations

I think this section too should go too. --Michel Fortin