A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.

To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on IRC (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From WHATWG Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Terms, Acronyms and Abbreviations)
(nibbler-site-verification Claimed spec link does not link to a spec: new section)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
** I agree.  If needed, we could create a glossary, but I don't think abbreviations and other terms should be on separate pages. --[[User:Lachlan Hunt|Lachlan Hunt]] 22:05, 15 Nov 2006 (PST)
 
** I agree.  If needed, we could create a glossary, but I don't think abbreviations and other terms should be on separate pages. --[[User:Lachlan Hunt|Lachlan Hunt]] 22:05, 15 Nov 2006 (PST)
 
*** I agree that this can be condensed to a single page, but I think we still need a page for this. A glossary is a good idea. --[[User:Matthew Raymond|Matthew Raymond]]
 
*** I agree that this can be condensed to a single page, but I think we still need a page for this. A glossary is a good idea. --[[User:Matthew Raymond|Matthew Raymond]]
 +
 +
==  nibbler-site-verification Claimed spec link does not link to a spec ==
 +
 +
valign="top"
 +
nibbler-site-verification
 +
Used to verify ownership of Nibbler site
 +
[http://nibbler.silktide.com/ Nibbler site]
 +
 +
Incomplete proposal
 +
Claimed spec link does not link to a spec
 +
 +
can someone help in tell me what i need to do to get this ok

Latest revision as of 11:02, 13 September 2012

WHATWG Specifications

  • I think this whole section should go. Problems should be categorised by what they apply to, not classified by which specification should solve them. The solution, not the problem, is bound to a particular specification. --Michel Fortin
    • I agree that problems shouldn't be categorised by the specification, but I don't agree this section should go. I think it's ok to provide some documentation about the actual specifications, including the actual features included within. It should be used to provide summaries and examples of actual features. Only when a proposal has been accepted and included in the spec, should it be included in this section. --Lachlan Hunt 22:03, 15 Nov 2006 (PST)

Terms, Acronyms and Abbreviations

  • I think this section too should go too. --Michel Fortin
    • I agree. If needed, we could create a glossary, but I don't think abbreviations and other terms should be on separate pages. --Lachlan Hunt 22:05, 15 Nov 2006 (PST)
      • I agree that this can be condensed to a single page, but I think we still need a page for this. A glossary is a good idea. --Matthew Raymond

nibbler-site-verification Claimed spec link does not link to a spec

valign="top" 
nibbler-site-verification
Used to verify ownership of Nibbler site
Nibbler site

Incomplete proposal
Claimed spec link does not link to a spec

can someone help in tell me what i need to do to get this ok