A user account is required in order to edit this wiki, but we've had to disable public user registrations due to spam.

To request an account, ask an autoconfirmed user on Chat (such as one of these permanent autoconfirmed members).

Problem Solving: Difference between revisions

From WHATWG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
:''Brief description of the problem to solve.''
:''Brief description of the problem to solve.''


== Problem Description ==
== Use Case Description ==
:''Complete description of the problem, explanation of why the current markup is insufficient, etc.''
''Complete description of the use case.''


== Possible Solutions ==
=== Current Limitations ===
''Explanation of why the current markup is insufficient.''
 
=== Current Usage and Workarounds ===
''Some evidence that this feature is desperately needed on the web.  You may provide a separate examples page for listing these.''
 
=== Benefits ===
 
''Explanation of how and why new markup would be useful.''
 
=== Requests for this Feature ===
 
* <cite>[http://example.com Source]</cite> <blockquote><p>I would like this feature ...</p></blockquote>
 
== Proposed Solutions ==


=== My Solution ===
=== My Solution ===
:''Brief description of the solution and of how it address the problem at hand.''
:''Brief description of the solution and of how it address the problem at hand.''


==== Details ====
==== Processing Model ====
:''Explanation of the changes introduced by this solution. It explains how the document is processed, and how errors are handled. This should be very clear, including things such as event timing if the solution involves events, how to create graphs representing the data in the case of semantic proposals, etc.''
:''Explanation of the changes introduced by this solution. It explains how the document is processed, and how errors are handled. This should be very clear, including things such as event timing if the solution involves events, how to create graphs representing the data in the case of semantic proposals, etc.''


==== Limitations and Other Problems ====  
==== Limitations ====  
:''Cases not covered by this solution in relation to the problem description; other problems with this solution, if any.''
:''Cases not covered by this solution in relation to the problem description; other problems with this solution, if any.''


Line 23: Line 37:
:''Reasons why page authors would use this solution.''
:''Reasons why page authors would use this solution.''


== Usage ==
[[Category:Proposals]]
:''Some evidence is there that this feature is desparately needed on the web.''

Latest revision as of 12:12, 26 January 2011

This is an empty page that describes what should be documented about a problem and the different solutions proposed to address it. Feel free to copy this template to when creating a new page.

Brief description of the problem to solve.

Use Case Description

Complete description of the use case.

Current Limitations

Explanation of why the current markup is insufficient.

Current Usage and Workarounds

Some evidence that this feature is desperately needed on the web. You may provide a separate examples page for listing these.

Benefits

Explanation of how and why new markup would be useful.

Requests for this Feature

  • Source

    I would like this feature ...

Proposed Solutions

My Solution

Brief description of the solution and of how it address the problem at hand.

Processing Model

Explanation of the changes introduced by this solution. It explains how the document is processed, and how errors are handled. This should be very clear, including things such as event timing if the solution involves events, how to create graphs representing the data in the case of semantic proposals, etc.

Limitations

Cases not covered by this solution in relation to the problem description; other problems with this solution, if any.

Implementation

Description of how and why browser vendors would take advantage of this feature.

Adoption

Reasons why page authors would use this solution.