Talk:Timed tracks - Revision history

Joeclark: /* Contrary to Hixie’s claim, I didn’t make any “mistakes” */ new section

2010-06-10T19:10:03Z

Contrary to Hixie’s claim, I didn’t make any “mistakes”: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:10, 10 June 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Don't we already have the [http://www.w3.org/TR/ttaf1-dfxp/ Timed Text] spec for this sort of thing?		Don't we already have the [http://www.w3.org/TR/ttaf1-dfxp/ Timed Text] spec for this sort of thing?

			== Contrary to Hixie’s claim, I didn’t make any “mistakes” ==

			My edits to this spec are based on 30 years’ experience in captioning, which is 30 years more than Hixie has. He knows next to nothing about the topic and his edits, which he glossed as “mistakes” (18:52, 21 April 2010), obliterate known use cases – known, that is, to actual captioning viewers.

			I say again: This will not end well. It’s another example of Hixie’s petty tyranny. The only upside is that petty is the only tyranny he can manage.

Dorward at 08:50, 26 April 2010

2010-04-26T08:50:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 26 April 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	You’re making more than the usual number of mistakes and, given Hixie’s imperviousness to any evidence he doesn’t agree with, your spec will without question end up being so flawed it cannot and will not be used.		You’re making more than the usual number of mistakes and, given Hixie’s imperviousness to any evidence he doesn’t agree with, your spec will without question end up being so flawed it cannot and will not be used.

			== Wheel reinvention? ==

			Don't we already have the [http://www.w3.org/TR/ttaf1-dfxp/ Timed Text] spec for this sort of thing?

Joeclark: Created page with '== This will not end well == You’re making more than the usual number of mistakes and, given Hixie’s imperviousness to any evidence he doesn’t agree with, your spec will w...'

2010-04-21T18:26:29Z

Created page with '== This will not end well == You’re making more than the usual number of mistakes and, given Hixie’s imperviousness to any evidence he doesn’t agree with, your spec will w...'

New page

== This will not end well ==

You’re making more than the usual number of mistakes and, given Hixie’s imperviousness to any evidence he doesn’t agree with, your spec will without question end up being so flawed it cannot and will not be used.