Talk:Main Page

2012-09-13T11:02:07Z

Ksounthe: /* nibbler-site-verification Claimed spec link does not link to a spec */ new section

== WHATWG Specifications ==

* I think this whole section should go. Problems should be categorised by what they apply to, not classified by which specification should solve them. The solution, not the problem, is bound to a particular specification. --[[User:Michel Fortin|Michel Fortin]]
** I agree that problems shouldn't be categorised by the specification, but I don't agree this section should go. I think it's ok to provide some documentation about the actual specifications, including the actual features included within. It should be used to provide summaries and examples of actual features. Only when a proposal has been accepted and included in the spec, should it be included in this section. --[[User:Lachlan Hunt|Lachlan Hunt]] 22:03, 15 Nov 2006 (PST)
*** That's fine with me. --[[User:Michel Fortin|Michel Fortin]]
**** That sounds fine, Lachlan. --[[User:Matthew Raymond|Matthew Raymond]]

== Terms, Acronyms and Abbreviations ==

* I think this section too should go too. --[[User:Michel Fortin|Michel Fortin]]
** I agree. If needed, we could create a glossary, but I don't think abbreviations and other terms should be on separate pages. --[[User:Lachlan Hunt|Lachlan Hunt]] 22:05, 15 Nov 2006 (PST)
*** I agree that this can be condensed to a single page, but I think we still need a page for this. A glossary is a good idea. --[[User:Matthew Raymond|Matthew Raymond]]

== nibbler-site-verification Claimed spec link does not link to a spec ==

valign="top"
nibbler-site-verification
Used to verify ownership of Nibbler site
[http://nibbler.silktide.com/ Nibbler site]

Incomplete proposal
Claimed spec link does not link to a spec

can someone help in tell me what i need to do to get this ok

WHATWG Wiki - User contributions [en]

Talk:Main Page